THE 2018 WAHS BASEBALL MYRTLE BEACH STORY – “COUNT II VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiff v. Defendants Pardoe, Freed, McCann, Miller, Holland, Weber, and John Does 1-20 Civil Rights Conspiracy”

Photo: Myrtle Beach Police Department image (top left)

Horry County Solicitor’s Office image (top right)

Atlantica Resort room image (bottom)

A previous, multi-part series of articles was published on this website with results of a more than 18-month long investigation by Talk Williamsport.com.

This story is graphic and contains details related to multiple indecent sexual assaults.

The author and editor of this story have made the editorial decision to not publish the names of the individuals under the age of 18 at the time of the incident who have been clearly identified as committing these acts in this case; even though they have been formally charged with a crime in South Carolina.

 

A Baseball Story In The Birthplace Of Little League Baseball

IF NOTHING HAPPENED IN MYRTLE BEACH

WHY WON’T THE WASD TELL US THE STORY?

THE 2018 WAHS BASEBALL MYRTLE BEACH STORY –

COUNT II

VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Plaintiff v. Defendants Pardoe, Freed, McCann, Miller, Holland, Weber, and John Does 1-20

Civil Rights Conspiracy

By Todd Bartley, Talk Williamsport

News@talkwilliamsport.com

The following article is the seventh in a series based upon the recent First Amended Complaint filed in Federal Court by the attorneys for John Doe #1; who was indecently sexually assaulted during the Williamsport Area High School Baseball Team trip in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina in the spring of 2018.

From the Complaint;

From the First Amended Complaint filed on Thursday, May 11, 2023.

149. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

150. The Defendants, acting within the scope of their employment and under color of state law, agreed among themselves and with other individuals to act in concert in order to deprive Plaintiff of his clearly established Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection under the law.

151. In furtherance of the conspiracy, Defendants engaged in and facilitated numerous overt acts, including, without limitation, the following:

a. Intentionally or with deliberate indifference failing to comply with their duty to keep minor students in their custody and care safe from harm;
b. Intentionally or with deliberate indifference creating an environment wherein Plaintiff was sexually assaulted;
c. Intentionally or with deliberate indifference creating an environment wherein Plaintiff was harassed, ridiculed, bullied, and tormented;
d. Instructing individuals to destroy evidence of the assault of Plaintiff;
e. Attempting to silence witnesses from coming forward about the assault and harassment of Plaintiff;
f. Failing to comply with the requirements of 63 Pa.C.S. § 6311, et seq., requiring the Defendants to report allegations of child abuse to the proper authorities;
g. Failing to notify law enforcement officials of the assault of Plaintiff;
h. Failing to cooperate with law enforcement officials regarding the investigation of the assault of Plaintiff;
i. Failing to conduct an unbiased investigation into the assault of Plaintiff;
j. Intentionally treating a similarly situated white victim of abuse better than Plaintiff, who is black;
k. Affording a white victim of abuse due process in vetting his allegations and compensating him $10,000.00 for said abuse;
l. Intentionally or with deliberate indifference exhibiting a racial bias against Plaintiff;
m. Purposefully discriminating against Plaintiff on the basis of his race;
n. Failing to keep Plaintiff and his family apprised of the status and/or outcome of the investigation;
o. Falsifying records and/or fabricating information in official investigatory documents;
p. Committing offenses which would violate the laws of the United States, including but not limited to 18 U.S.C. §§ 242, 249, and 1503;
q. Committing offenses which would violate the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, including but not limited to 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 4904, 4910, 4952, 4958, 5101, and 5301

152. The acts and omissions by the Defendants Pardoe, Freed, McCann, Miller, Holland, Weber, and John Does 1-20 were made in a willful disregard for the safety of Plaintiff and a reckless or callous indifference for his protected rights.

153. Defendants’ acts and omissions, as described above, were the direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries. Defendants knew, or should have known, that their actions and/or inactions would result in Plaintiff’s grave physical, emotional, psychological and other harm.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants Pardoe, Freed, McCann, Miller, Holland, Weber, and John Does 1-20 in a sum in excess of Seventy-Five Thousand ($75,000.00) Dollars, and in excess of the prevailing arbitration limits, in compensatory damages and punitive damages, exclusive of pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interests and costs.

“COUNT III, VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiff v. All Defendants Violation of Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment Rights to Equal Protection and Due Process” in this series, is forthcoming.

This is an exclusive and developing story on TalkWilliamsport.com.